The Relationship Series · Out now
Ambiguous Relationships: You Act Like a Couple but Still Have No Label. The Exact Words to Get Clarity, Commit, or Walk Away
Second Edition. Previously published as Why You’re Still in the Situationship.
You act like a couple. You just can't say the word.
The complete guide to undefined relationships: the psychology of why you're stuck, the instruments to find out where you stand, and the exact words to get clarity — whatever the answer turns out to be.
5 profiles · full-page assessments · 10 script sections · 25 questions
Also on Amazon in the UK · US · Canada · Australia
Read before you decide
You don't have to rely on the description alone. Read the whole first chapter from the published book here, or use Read Sample / Look Inside on Amazon to explore the book before you buy.
You act like a couple. So why won't they commit?
Enough warmth to feel like a relationship. Not enough clarity to know what you are. This is the book for the ambiguous relationship: it helps you work out where you stand, separate commitment uncertainty from a mismatch in intentions, decide what you want, and find the exact words to ask for it, or to walk away.
Can a situationship turn into a relationship? Learn how to ask where you stand and decide what to do when commitment stays unclear.
Questions this book answers
If you spend real time together but the relationship has no name and no clear exclusivity — and raising it changes the subject — you are likely in one. The book helps you tell early dating, casual-but-clear and genuine ambiguity apart.
Answered in full in Chapter 1.
Sometimes — but usually only when the ambiguity is named and one person is willing to build, not just continue. The distinction that matters is behaviour over time, not intensity in the moment.
Answered in full in Chapter 15.
Unspoken exclusivity is assumed, not agreed — which is exactly where people get hurt. Until it is stated, each person may be operating on a different rule. The useful step is to name it rather than infer it.
Answered in full in Chapter 3.
The arrangement can give closeness without the commitment or vulnerability a definition would require. It does not prove they don't care. It does show that feeling something and being willing to build something are different things.
Answered in full in Chapter 8.
Warmth without commitment can create a powerful cycle of uncertainty. The book maps five recurring situationship profiles and explains how intermittent reinforcement — the "slot-machine effect" — can make inconsistent attention unusually difficult to step away from.
Answered in full in Chapter 8.
Usually a readable pattern, not a mystery — the profiles and the Consistency Test turn contradictory behaviour into a reading you can act on.
Answered in full in Chapter 3.
With a script, not a confrontation: the book gives word-for-word language for the conversation and for the exit.
Answered in full in Chapter 14.
With language, not a scene — the Script Library includes the exit conversation word for word, and the chapters after it cover recovering cleanly.
Answered in full in Chapter 16.
Start with the pattern you recognise. An undefined relationship → this book. Wanting closeness and fearing it → The Fearful Avoidant. Needing distance, or loving someone who pulls away → The Dismissive Avoidant. Overthinking and fearing being left → The Anxious Attached.
It is a complete guide, assessment suite, decision system and complete script library for the relationship that has no name — not generic advice.
These are a few of the questions the book works through in full, with the exact words to use for each one.
The answer depends on what was actually agreed and what was assumed. Undefined exclusivity creates exactly this collision: one person can feel betrayed while the other believes no rule existed. The useful next step is to name the boundary rather than infer it.
Answered in full in Chapter 3.
Undefined does not mean emotionless. People can become attached in a connection they still refuse to define. The distinction that matters is feeling versus behaviour: what are they actually willing to build?
Answered in full in Chapter 8.
Usually not the amount of sex or affection. The sharper distinction is whether expectations and boundaries are clear. A situationship is defined by ambiguity; a healthy casual arrangement can be clear.
Answered in full in Chapter 6.
The same situationship, two experiences
The gap between those two experiences is the situationship. Naming it is where clarity begins.
Built to be used
The depth of a complete guide, with full-page instruments you work through and scripts you can use word for word.
The five profiles who keep things undefined, and how to recognise which one you're in a situationship with.
Why ambiguity can feel like chemistry: the slot-machine effect and attachment mismatch.
Full-page instruments, including the Clarity Quiz and the Consistency Test, that turn a feeling into a reading.
Decision trees and a verification period that replace another month of wondering with a structured answer.
Ten sections of word-for-word language for the define-the-relationship conversation, the follow-up and the exit.
What to do after the answer: leaving cleanly, staying deliberately, and choosing differently next time.
More than dating advice. Five profiles, a full assessment suite, a quick decision guide and ten sections of scripts, for the relationship that has no name. About the method and the author →
See the instruments
Two pages from the book, shown as printed. The rest are inside.


Also inside the book
Want to judge the writing for yourself? Read the whole first chapter from the published paperback — no sign-up.
A situationship is a restaurant that won’t seat you but won’t cross your name off the waiting list either. You’re just standing there, hungry, watching other tables get served.
Naming a profile or a pattern can explain mixed signals. It cannot make control, coercion or repeated boundary violations acceptable. If fear is present, safety comes before every script in this book.
Behind the work
This book grew from a decade of independent research and writing that began with personal questions alongside therapy and expanded into a wider study of attachment, relationships and modern dating.
Personal experience may be where a question begins, but it is not presented as evidence for everybody else's experience. Research findings, informed interpretation and original frameworks are kept distinct, and where therapy, professional support or another author's work may help a reader go further, the book says so.
What early readers say
"It's clear and the structure is perfect."
NetGalley reviewer, on Why You’re Still in the Situationship · five stars
This review is of the first edition, published as Why You’re Still in the Situationship. The second edition keeps the same twenty chapters in the same order, with the same quiz, assessments and scripts; two chapters were retitled.
An independent NetGalley reviewer gave the first edition five stars, singling out the way it routes you to the chapters that fit your stage, the Bottom Line and reflection question that close each chapter, the Clarity Quiz, Readiness Assessment and Consistency Test as practical tools, the slot-machine comparison for on-and-off attention, and the conversation scripts as examples of healthy communication. She also noted that it points readers to therapy and to other good books rather than claiming to be the whole answer. Read the full review on NetGalley.
Try before you buy
Chapter 1, "The Relationship Without the Rights", as it appears in the second-edition paperback: the whole chapter, then the first two sections of the Clarity Quiz. Thirteen pages, no sign-up.
Also from Julian Hollis
Does the same push-pull repeat across your relationships? If the pattern outlives the person (closeness, then distance, in every story) the situationship may be the symptom and the attachment pattern the cause.
You're allowed to know where you stand. By the last page you'll have a clearer way to decide what you want — and the words to say it.
Evidence you can check
Peer-reviewed studies and established findings on attachment and commitment.
Conclusions drawn from several well-established findings that point in the same direction.
Research-informed instruments created to make the grey zone usable, clearly identified as original.
Chapter-level research notes, a bibliography and a glossary keep the distinction visible.